• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

Follow Us

A coalition of environmental, conservation, and outdoor recreation organizations in PA.

Header Left

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Coalition Partners
    • Strategic Plan
  • Advocacy Updates
    • Legislation
    • State Budget
    • Environmental Funds & Investments
  • Engage
    • Advocate for GG III
    • Restore PA
    • Defend Environmental Funds
  • Stories
  • search
  • DONATE
  • Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • Coalition Partners
    • Strategic Plan
  • Advocacy Updates
    • Legislation
    • State Budget
    • Environmental Funds & Investments
  • Engage
    • Advocate for GG III
    • Restore PA
    • Defend Environmental Funds
  • Stories
  • search
  • DONATE

Demand and Need: Keystone and Environmental Stewardship Funds

February 8, 2019 //  by Nicole Faraguna

Governor Wolf’s budget proposal would strip tens of millions of dollars away from tangible project investments in order to fund general government operations. Tax receipts were wisely dedicated to the Keystone Recreation, Park and Conservation Fund in 1993 and the Environmental Stewardship Fund in 1999 (and again in 2002) in continuation of Pennsylvania’s tradition of investing in its communities, redressing the environmental damage of the past, and respecting our generations yet to come.

Keystone and ESF come nowhere near to meeting present demand. Roughly half of all project investment proposals must be turned away. In the case of DCNR Keystone investments, 46% of projects are rejected for lack of sufficient state funds. And these rejections only represent a portion of unmet demand because grant applicants greatly self-limit their submissions knowing that competition for scarce dollars is fierce. Further, even for those projects funded, DCNR is only able to fund 85% on average of each request (and those requests already are generally limited to 50% of total project costs).

Pennsylvania’s environmental funding needs are huge. Pressing water issues—from water quality investments needed for the Susquehanna and Chesapeake and Pennsylvania’s other water basins to municipal stormwater management and flood reduction measures—hundreds of millions if not billions of dollars are needed in the coming years. The Keystone Fund delivers $7 in flood control and prevention, water treatment, and other natural services for every dollar invested. (See Pennsylvania’s Return on Investment in the Keystone Recreation, Park and Conservation Fund and other studies in the Economic Benefits section of https://conservationtools.org.)  Now is the time to see how Pennsylvania’s dedicated environmental funds can deliver more, not less, in project investments.

The Governor’s budget proposal threatens to upend more than two decades of bipartisan consensus on the need to maintain the dedication of the Keystone Fund and ESF so that they may consistently invest in projects that deliver today and will continue delivering for future generations. The Growing Greener Coalition asks the Governor to rethink the Administration’s strategy and for the General Assembly to reject this proposal.

Category: State Budget

Previous Post: « Governor’s Budget Proposes Stripping Tens of Millions from Community Projects
Next Post: Open Letter to Gov. Wolf and Members of the General Assembly »

Reader Interactions

Footer

Contact Information

Growing Greener Coalition
610 N. 3rd Street, #301
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, 17101
717.230.8560 | [email protected]

 

Stay Connected

Get Updates

Copyright © 2023 · Growing Greener Coalition